I've been really worried about Comcast's 250GB bandwidth cap policy that takes effect on October 1, 2008. I called Comcast customer service and spoke to a rep named Cynthia, who had not yet been informed of it. I guess Comcast's CS reps are the last to find out these things. I found this a little disturbing, but dismissed it, as I am also part of a large company and don't always receive news in a timely manner. Cynthia put me on hold for a bit and verified it with her manager. I then voiced my concerns about my potential usage. Unfortunately, Cynthia was not able to answer my questions, so she pointed me to Rick Germano, Comcast's Senior VP of Customer Operations. So I composed an e-mail to Rick expressing my concerns that I might reach the cap by merely using VOIP. I also expressed concerns about those who use content delivery services such as Netflix, Napster, and so on.
A short time later, I received a call from Frank Eliason, a "Digital Care Director" with Comcast, which was a pleasant surprise. Frank works for Rick, and Rick had sent him my e-mail. Frank's job is to address concerns that are raised online via blogs, social networking sites, and forums.
Frank informed me that the bandwidth cap is nothing new. It's been there all along, but was never clearly explained. He admitted that Comcast was not as forthcoming as it should have been about this in the past, and stated Comcast is making efforts to increase its transparency to consumers. This is a good step in that direction, albeit a bit late.
Frank's main point was that if you haven't yet been called about your bandwidth usage, you won't be called now that the announcement has been made. The purpose of the announcement was to lift the veil of secrecy over Comcast's bandwith limits.
I brought up my concern about my VOIP usage potentially maxing out my bandwidth. Frank didn't think that VOIP would use up much of that bandwidth. He did say, however, that people who download lots of DVD-quality movies online would likely be more apt to reach their download limits. So that brought us to the issue of content delivery networks and legitimately purchased content. Frank also didn't think that would matter so much, but brought up the time limits imposed on such content. The example he gave was that the Apple Store rents you a DVD quality movie that you can view for 30 days, and that if you downloaded 125 of those movies, you would be at risk of exceeding your cap. True, I would never have time to watch 125 DVD-quality movies in a month, but if I legitimately purchased them for viewing later, I would still hit my limit. I sensed that Frank was alluding to the P2P file sharing networks eating up bandwidth, but even they don't really use up that much. That's another veil that needs to be lifted.
To better manage bandwidth usage, Frank stated that Comcast is preparing a bandwidth monitoring application that users can utilize to keep track of their usage. No firm delivery date has been set.
It was also interesting to find out that Comcast is working on DOCSIS 3.0, which will increase capacity significantly. The work is already going on to upgrade certain areas. I happen to live in one of those areas, so I hope I get a chance to try it.
All in all, I feel a bit better about the announcement. Comcast has a lot of work to do in the coming months and years. We'll see what happens.
Friday, August 29, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Absolutely ridiculous. I cannot believe anyone would stand for this. First of all 250GB is FAR under what I use each month. I've had continuous usage of about 500gb per month for the past 2 years without any "phone calls". I'm sure I will be receiving one after October. And another thing, you are excited about this new increase in speed? First of all DOCSIS 2.0 is quite capable of producing speeds well into 40+GB, don't let their lies fool you. If they are going to increase speeds why not do it immediately? I'll tell you why, they are trying to compete with other companies such as verizon's FIOS and the only way they can keep up is by slowly increasing speeds. But then what happens? They can't handle the pressure from that now and they have to start capping bandwidth. Yeah so all of you who are so excited about "faster speeds" I hope you realize that the bottle neck 95% of the time is the host in which you are communicating to. But all people think about is 'I want faster faster faster' while the majority don't even know what an 8Gb connection actually equates to. Yet they decide to do something damning such as capping our bandwidth and everyone sits around twiddling their thumbs having no f*cking idea what bandwidth is in the first place. Wow, sorry, I just found out about this and had to blow off some steam.
After reading the author's comments about VoIP being able to use up a 250GB/Month cap, and at the same time saying he doesn't think P2P uses very much, I pretty much called BS on the entire article.
First of all, even talking 24/7 for 31 days straight over ViOP G729 will only use around 20 GB (that includes both download and upload links). Even the G711 VoIP format would only take 57 GB for that same 24/7/31 call.
G729: 13.8 MB/Hr each direction
G711: 38.3 MB/Hr each direction
13.8MB*24*2*31 = 20534 MB (20.5 GB)
38.3MB*24*2*31 = 56990 MB (56.9 GB)
That's MB per hr x 24 hours x 2 (to include both upload and downlinks as a total) x 31 days (one month).
Second, it's quite easy to burn up 30-40 GB+ a day just in downloads using P2P and Usenet. I know because I do it on a daily basis.
Please get your fact straight next time, because you just make yourself look clueless and uninformed which discredits anything you have to say, even if some of it is right.
Post a Comment